🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear response by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize frozen Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on accounts in Russian state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to determine in the coming days regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. This scheme involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial needs.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union officials have maintained that their plan is legally sound. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has called any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, including seizing EU private investors' holdings within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are working on measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European companies. Additionally, they are crafting protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would only be required to return the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast destruction inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an different approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that when you cause all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."